To transform the way clinicians review research from a static text-based model to a dynamic and interactive visual landscape.
The status-quo: PDF Meta-Analyses
Clinicians currently access literature reviews and meta-analyses in PDFs, a format with limitations:
Time-consuming and effort-intensive to read, as most studies are between 6,000-30,000 words
Neither interactive nor updatable
Does not provide access to the underlying data
The status-quo: PDF Meta-Analyses
Clinicians currently access literature reviews and meta-analyses in PDFs, a format with limitations:
Time-consuming and effort-intensive to read, as most studies are between 6,000-30,000 words
Neither interactive nor updatable
Does not provide access to underlying data
The Nested Knowledge platform eliminates the inefficiency of the systematic meta-analysis
A 2016 article published in The BMJ, which analyzed the average time and manpower required to perform a systematic review of medical interventions, found that the mean time to complete a systematic review was 67.3 weeks, or over 1.25 years!
We start by obtaining clinician input on the most pressing research questions in interventional care.
Our team employs cutting-edge research techniques and data visualization tools to create nests that synthesize literature and enable clinician users to interact with patient characteristics, therapies, and outcomes.
We continuously update the nests, making it easy for users to remain up-to-date on clinical research.
The Nested Knowledge Innovation
We start by obtaining clinician input on the most pressing research questions in interventional care.
Our team employs cutting-edge research techniques and data visualization tools to create nests that synthesize literature and enable clinician users to interact with patient characteristics, therapies, and outcomes.
We continuously update the nests, making it easy for users to remain up-to-date on clinical research.
