In the ever-evolving field of stroke research, new questions about different therapies, trial outcomes, and even metrics of procedural success are constantly emerging, meaning that systematic reviews are needed on a consistent basis to extract all information needed to inform both patient care and future research. In these projects, because of the major decisions that may result from the findings and because of how busy stroke physicians are, the efficiency and accuracy are paramount.
Recently, we sat down for a conversation with Dr. Yasmin Aziz, a practicing neurologist and Assistant Professor in the Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine Department at the University of Cincinnati (UC) Gardner Neuroscience Institute.